Question

An estimated 80 percent of American adults think music lessons, though at times boring and challenging in the eyes of some kids, improve children’s ability to learn or their performance in school . They say that the satisfaction for learning to play a new song helps a child express creativity.

Researchers at Harvard University, however, have found that there’s one thing musical training does not do. Samuel Mehr, the leading researcher of the new study, said it is wrong to think that learning to play a musical instrument improves a child’s intellectual development. The evidence comes from studies that measured the mental ability of two groups of 4-year-olds and their parents. One group attended music class; the comparison group went to a class that places importance on the optical arts-arts that can be seen.

“We found no evidence for any advantage on any of these tests for the kids participating in these music classes,” said Mehr.

Samuel Mehr says researchers have carried out many studies in an effort to learn whether musical training can make children smarter. Only one study seems to show a small percentage increase in IQ, intellectual scores among students after one year of music lessons.

He does not believe that IQ is a good measure of a child’s intelligence. Therefore, the researchers in his study compared how well children in the musical training group did on mental processing tasks, then the results were compared to those of children who did not take lessons.

Music lessons may not offer children a fast easy way to gain entry to the best schools later of their life, but the training is still important.

Mr Mehr notes that the works of writer William Shakespeare are not taught , so the children will do better in physics. He says Shakespeare is taught because it is important for cultural reasons.“And I don’t think music needs to be any different than that.”

1.What attitude do most American grown-ups have towards music lessons? _________

A. Uninterested        B. Approving                       C. Doubtful                          D. Uncertain

2.The underlined word“optical”in Paragraph 2 probably means       .

A. visual                      B. colorful                           C. traditional                       D. serious

3.According to Samuel Mehr, _________ .

A. many studies show that music training can improve IQ

B. IQ is a good measure of a child’s intelligence

C. music can enable a child to go to a better school

D. music should be taught for cultural reasons

4.The study shows that       .

A. early music training has negative effects

B. musical lessons should be stopped at school

C. musical training doesn’t improve kids’ intelligence

D. playing musical instrument makes kids more creative

 

Answer 1

【答案】

 

1.B

2.A

3.D

4.C

【解析】

試題分析：文章介紹了一個(gè)研究結(jié)果，這個(gè)研究表明音樂訓(xùn)練不能提高孩子的智力，但是這并不意味著音樂課就不重要。

1.細(xì)節(jié)題：從文章第一段的句子：An estimated 80 percent of American adults think music lessons, though at times boring and challenging in the eyes of some kids, improve children’s ability to learn or their performance in school可知大多數(shù)美國人對(duì)音樂課的態(tài)度是贊同的，選B

2.猜詞題：從第二段的句子：the comparison group went to a class that places importance on the optical arts-arts that can be seen.可知optical是visual“視覺的”意思，選A

3.細(xì)節(jié)題：從文章最后一段的句子：He says Shakespeare is taught because it is important for cultural reasons.“And I don’t think music needs to be any different than that.可知根據(jù)Samuel Mehr所說因?yàn)槲幕�的原因，�?yīng)該教音樂, 選D

4.主旨題：從文章第二段的句子：Samuel Mehr, the leading researcher of the new study, said it is wrong to think that learning to play a musical instrument improves a child’s intellectual development.可知這個(gè)研究表明音樂訓(xùn)練不能提高孩子的智力，選C。

考點(diǎn)：考查教育類短文